Act One Part One
Today we blocked out the beginnings of Act One, Scene One.
Now that we have been cast, we are beginning to block out
the scenes of the play. This first look at the scenes won’t go too far into the
examining of individual lines but is more about staging and identifying
motivations and key lines in the text.
Today we looked at the very first scene of the play, where
Katurian has been arrested and finds himself in a detention centre, having no
understanding of why he has been brought here. In this section of the scene he
meets the other two main characters, detectives Tupolski and Ariel, and learns
that he has been brought here because of his stories.
In The Pillowman, I play the character of Tupolski. My
version of the character will be female, but I will reference Tupolski as
written in the play.
Tupolski is the leading detective in the investigation and
he truly believes that Katurian is responsible for the murder of three
children. One of Tupolski’s main characteristics is that he good at
understanding, and therefore manipulating people. A large part of the way he acts within the play
is staged in order to frighten, confuse or convince Katurian into confessing.
On entering the stage, Tupolski behaves kindly towards Katurian in order to
lull him into speaking freely. However there are moments when he becomes more
serious and focussed, and then his calculating nature becomes more evident-
these are times when the questioning is heading in a direction that Tupolski
feels is especially important to the case.
So for example, during the line “I’m not like some of these…” Tuposlki’s
attitude changes and he becomes more serious. The full stop preceding the line “I don’t know.” Is a moment where we decided my
character should lean back in his chair and cross his legs, so that the shift
in intrigue can be seen by the audience and even as a cue to Katurian to think
carefully about his response to Tupolski’s next question.
Another part Tupolski plays is in his relationship with Ariel.
Throughout the play these two must work together, but there is an underlining
sense of conflict in their partnership that increases as the play goes on. For
example, there is a clash between the two over interrogation methods. Ariel
just wants to torture the truth out of him, but Tupolski prefers to speak with
Katurian. Here Ariel speaks out in the middle of Tupolski’s questioning and my
character must pause in order to say “who’s the Number
one on this investigation Ariel, me or you?” This is followed by a pause as
Tupolski listens for Ariel’s objection. His only response is to crunch his
boiled sweet. In my opinion this should be interpreted as Ariel having a
problem with Tupolski’s authority, but at this point he is not angry enough to
voice it out loud. I believe that this
conflict is falsified by the detectives as part of their interrogation tactics.
Outside of his job, I feel
that Tupolski finds it difficult to make strong connections with others, as a
result of detaching himself from most emotion in his job. However, I do think
that Ariel and Tupolski share a comradeship that perhaps isn’t the same as what
we would consider a ‘normal friendship’.
There are times in the play when the detectives work together.
Each time Katurian mentions that they are in fact “not friends” both characters
share a look that suggests this line is offensive to them. This helps to build
tension for Ariel’s character, so that when Katurian finishes her line, Ariel
has anger to motivate him into pulling Katurian of the chair and against the
wall, following with “I’m going to hit
you so hard in the fucking head.”
I think this clearly expresses the roles that they both play.
Ariel’s position is to be threatening and unpredictable in order to shock the
audience with his actions. Tupolskis lack of concern over his attack is more
unnerving and shows how Katurian won’t be able to gain sympathy in order to
escape.
Comments
Post a Comment