Overview
Another thing which has been important during the process is drawing on our understanding of Frantic Assembly style physical theatre, for which the style of play is very important. In some situations the practice of creating movement before meaning made creating the piece much easier. However this was only used for small sections or places where it was appropriate. It was important not to let this style take over, because the physicality and principals of Frantic is fundamentally different to that of Berkoff. With creation in Frantic, choices in movement have no motivation and every choice creates something that is open to interpretation, whereas with Berkoff the movements are created to have meaning and embody staccato emotions of the play. There is also the possibility of falling into the endless variations that exist in Frantic Assembly. For our final piece we devised a section for Ballet of the Stools which was similar to chair duets we had done in the past. At first we chose a piece of music that was very emotive and fluid, and while this had an interesting affect on our actions, it diverted too much from the style of Berkoff. With this practice, the style is clearly defined by its staccato movements, its relentless quality and fast pace
that was presented in the second piece of music we chose.
I think that, despite struggling with the vocal and physical style at the start of the unit, I have come to appreciate it for its controlled unique approach to theatre. Berkoff is not like traditional drama. Instead of finding this battle between your character and your own personality through emotions and actions, it is a chance to be completely removed from yourself and do things that would never be possible in real life. The Berkoff style creates its own world, one that lives off the sinister and the hysterical and the wondrously absurd to which we are all morbidly drawn.
Comments
Post a Comment